The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of an ex-parte petition by directing respondents to implement a pending judgment, subject to the final outcome of a Supreme Court leave to appeal filed by them in Suraj Mani's case.
Direction to implement the judgment in question, subject to the final outcome of the SLP in Suraj Mani's case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No. 244 of 2024 Date of decision: 05.04.2024
Desh Raj …Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. …Respondents Co ram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. Devender Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A. G. with Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.G., Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.Gs. and Mr. Raj Negi, Dy. A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Ms. Sharmila Patial, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to implement the judgment in question subject to final outcome of SLP filed by them in Suraj Mani's case. Needful be done within four weeks.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) 5th April, 2024 (sanjeev) Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Suraj Mani's caseReferred¶10
Desh Raj
State of H. P. & Ors.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
