An ex-petitioned matter was disposed of by directing respondents to implement a judgment in a question under consideration subject to the final outcome of a specific SLP filed by the respondents in Suraj Mani's case.
Respondents to implement the judgment in question subject to final outcome of SLP in Suraj Mani's case within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.231 of 2024 Date of decision: 08.04.2024
Geeta Ram ….Petitioner Versus HPSEB Ltd. and Anr. ….Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting ?1 No.
For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge(Oral):
The respondents are directed to implement the judgment in question subject to final outcome of SLP filed by them in Suraj Mani’s case. Needful be done within four weeks.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
April 08, 2024 (reena)
1
Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement ?
Geeta Ram
HPSEB Ltd.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
