Execution petition dismissed as infructuous because counsel stated the main suit had already been dismissed. The court disposed of the petition as having become infructuous; no substantive proposition of general application decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex.P. No. : 6 of 2020 Decided on : 12.11.2024
Chaman Lal & Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Manbhru & Ors.
…Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. B.C. Verma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 8, 11 to 14 and 16.
Respondents No. 9 and 15 are stated to be expired.
Respondent No. 10 ex parte.
Virender Singh, Judge (Oral)
It has been submitted by learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner that the present petition has become infructuous, as, the main suit has been dismissed.
In view of the above, the present petition is
2
disposed of as having been infructuous.
(Virender Singh) Judge
November 12, 2024 Vriti
Chaman Lal & Ors.
Manbhru & Ors.
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
