Roshan Lal Mehta v. Suraj and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA…
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:5231
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 11 of 2018
Decided on: 16.07.2024
Roshan Lal Mehta .…Decree Holder Versus Shri Suraj and another …Judgment Debtors Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the Decree Holder : | Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the Judgment Debtors: | J.D No. 1_ex parte_. |
| Mr. M.A. Khan, Senior Advocate with M/s Hem Kanta Kaushal and Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocates for J.D. No. 2. |
|
| Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate for proposed objector. |
|
| Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge |
(Oral) |
Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the decree
holder, on instructions imparted by learned Instructing Counsel, submits that the decree holder is not coming forth to impart instructions. In this view of the matter, these proceedings are closed. All pending miscellaneous application(s), stand disposed of without adjudication on merit.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) July 16, 2024 Judge (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Roshan Lal Mehta
Shri Suraj and another
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court