Execution petition dismissed as infructuous due to respondents passing a consideration order in compliance. Petitioner permitted to challenge the consideration order separately.
Instant petition dismissed as rendered infructuous; pending applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1036 of 2024 Date of decision : 11.11.2024. Vijay Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Gobind Korla, Addl. A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
In compliance to the judgment sought to be executed, the respondents have passed a consideration order, thereby rendering the instant petition infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, in case the petitioner still feels aggrieved with the consideration order, he is at liberty to assail the same strictly in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice.
(Satyen Vaidya) 11th November, 2024 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Vijay Kumar
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
