Writ petition withdrawn by counsel for the petitioner; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications, if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:4218 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA no. 7690 of 2020 Date of decision : 01.07.2024. Lekh Raj. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents no. 1 to 3.
Ms. Shikha Razta, Advocate, vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent no.4.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao Chief Justice (Oral):
Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the Writ
Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 1st July, 2024 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Lekh Raj
State of H.P.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
