The petitioner conceded that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The Court disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 7262 of 2020 Decided on: 10.05.2024
______________________________________________________________ Raj Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents _ Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
_______________________________________________________________ Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits
that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous with the efflux of time.
1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed
of
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge
( Sushil Kukreja )
10th May, 2024 Judge (raman)
Raj Singh
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
