Preeti Devi v. the State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court observed that the impugned judgment was duly complied with based on records placed by the Additional Advocate General, and consequently closed the matter.
The court observed that the impugned judgment was duly complied with based on records placed by the Additional Advocate General, and consequently closed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Preeti Devi Vs. State & Ors.
CWP No. 9440/2024
19.12.2024 Present: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Mr. L.N. Sharma, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Adovcates General with Mr. Sikander Bhushan and Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record a copy of instructions memo dated 11.12.2024 alongwith office order dated 23.11.2024 and on that basis submits that the judgment in question stands duly complied with.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
19th December, 2024 (rohit)
Preeti Devi
State & Ors.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court