Mangal Singh v. Hpsebl and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim relief granted restraining respondents from effecting recoveries from the petitioner pending the petition. Application disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Restraint on recoveries
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mangal Singh vs. State of H.P. and others
CWP No. 8838 of 2024
02.09.2024 Present:
Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Reply be filed within a period of four weeks.
List after four weeks.
CMP No. 14893 of 2024
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
During the pendency of the present petition,
respondents are restrained from effecting any recoveries in pursuance to office order dated 11.03.2024 appended alongwith the present petition as Annexure P-5 from the present applicant. The application stands disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mangal Singh
- respondent
State of H.P. and others
Coram
Bipin C. Negi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/8838/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court