Writ petition against HPSEBL withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file afresh if necessity arises; court dismissed it as withdrawn and disposed of pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.8414 of 2021
Decided on: 3rd December, 2024
_________________________________________________________________ Jitender Kumar ....Petitioner Versus HPSEBL . …Respondent
________________________________________________________________ Coram_
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition in case necessity so arises in future. Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
December 3, 2024
R.Atal
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Jitender Kumar
HPSEBL
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
