HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP…
withdrawal of petition granted
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
| CWP No. 786 of 2021 Decided on: 13.03.2024 |
||
|---|---|---|
| ____________________ Jagdish Chand & Ors. |
______________ Versus |
______________________ ………..Petitioners |
| State of HP & Ors. | …..Respondents | |
| ____________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice San Whether approved for rep |
_______________ deep Sharma, Ju orting?1 |
_____________________ dge. |
| For the petitioners | : Mr. Surin |
der Saklani, Advocate. |
| For the respondents | : Mr. Anup with Mr. Verma, Generals, |
Rattan, Advocate General, Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C Additional Advocate for respondents/ State. |
________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge ( oral)
Learned counsel representing petitioner, on instructions, states that in view of compromise arrived inter se the petitioner and Society, he has instructions to withdraw the present petition, as such the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly.
All pending applications also stand disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
March 13, 2024 sunil
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Jagdish Chand
State of HP
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
