Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner submitted that intervening circumstances had rendered the subject matter moot. Pending applications, if any, also stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 724 of 2024 Date of decision : 7.5.2024. Dharmender Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge . Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Ranjana Patial, DAG, for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of intervening circumstances, the subject matter of the petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 7th May, 2024 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Dharmender Kumar
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
