The petition is disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority to decide the representation annexed to the petition by passing a speaking order within six weeks.
Direction to Competent Authority to decide representation and pass speaking order within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:6705
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
CWP No. 7139 of 2024 Decided on : 09.08.2024
Dinesh Kumar and others
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others.
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral )
Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2 . Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed representation Annexure P-6 with regard to the issues raised in the petition, but the same has not been
decided by the Authority concerned till date.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2024:HHC:6705
of with the direction that let representation Annexure P-6 of the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of six weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
August 09, 2024 (Shivank Thakur)
Dinesh Kumar and others
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
