Single Judge disposed of the Writ Petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation on benefits by passing a speaking order within eight weeks.
Direction to Competent Authority to decide the representation on benefits by passing a speaking order within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:5593
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 7035 of 2024 Decided on: 05.07.2024
Ranjna … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
_____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Law Officer, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
July 22, 2024 (narender)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's representation regarding benefits be decided by the Competent Authority by passing a speaking order within eight weeks.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Taj Mohammad and others vs. State of H.P. and othersReferred¶14
CWP No. 2004 of 2017
Ranjna
The State of Himachal Pradesh
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
