This is an oral judgment where the court disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within six weeks.
Direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:4611
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 6227 of 2024 Decided on: 05.07.2024
Sh. Chet Ram … Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. and another … Respondents Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
_____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Counsel, accepts notice
on behalf of the respondents.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
a period of six weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
July 05, 2024 ( narender )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a representation filed by the petitioner should be decided by the competent authority within a specified timeframe.
Sh. Chet Ram
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd.
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
