A writ petition raising a service issue covered by a prior Division Bench judgment was allowed; respondents were directed to reinstate the petitioner in service and permit continuation until he attains 60 years of age.
Petition allowed; respondents directed to reinstate petitioner in service and permit him to continue till age 60 years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 2024:HHC:4544 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 6220 of 2024 Decided on: 5th July, 2024
_______________________________________________________ Madan Lal ....Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P and others ...Respondents.
_______________________________________________________ Coram_ Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Mr. Sushant Kaprete, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Arsh Rattan, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan and Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocate General.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (oral)
rendered by this Court on 28.05.2024 in CWP no. 2274 of 2021
( Satya Devi vs. State of H.P and others) and batch.
the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service and
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
permit the petitioner to continue till he attains the age of 60 years.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao ) Chief Justice
5th July, 2024 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (priti) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement in service till the age of 60 years on the same terms as the Satya Devi batch judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satya Devi vs. State of H.P and othersFollowed
CWP no. 2274 of 2021 (Satya Devi vs. State of H.P and others)
Madan Lal
State of H.P
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
