In this writ petition, the petitioner sought assurance that his representations (Annexures P-7 and P-8) would be decided by the competent authority within a reasonable timeframe.
Direction to the competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representations (Annexures P-7 and P-8) within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:4238
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 6015 of 2024 Decided on: 01.07.2024
Surjeet Singh … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondents Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
_____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : M/s B.L. Soni, Nitin Soni and Sunil Gautam, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Law Officer, accepts
notice on behalf of the respondents.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
a period of four weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
July 01, 2024 ( narender )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation made by the petitioner should be decided by the competent Authority within a reasonable time.
Surjeet Singh
The State of Himachal Pradesh
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
