Petition seeking parity with an earlier HRTC judgment. Court directed the competent authority to consider and decide petitioner's case strictly per Bhagat Ram (CWP 2108 of 2023) within six months and disposed of pending applications.
Direction to competent authority to decide case per CWP 2108/2023 within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 3146 of 2024 Decided on: 19th April, 2024
Rajinder Singha .......Petitioner Versus HRTC and another ...Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
Road Transport Corporation and others . He further submits that the petitioner shall be content at this stage, in case the competent authority is directed to consider and decide
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
the case of the petitioner in the light of judgment passed by this Court in Bhagat Ram’s case (supra).
April 19, 2024 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's case, covered by the Bhagat Ram judgment, should be decided by the competent authority in terms of that judgment?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhagat Ram vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and othersRelied on
CWP No. 2108 of 2023
Rajinder Singha
HRTC
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
