The High Court dismissed the withdrawal application and the underlying writ petition on the respondent's voluntary withdrawal of the originating OA. No other order was necessary.
Petition dismissed as result of withdrawal of OA No. 2599/2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.3057 of 2016 Decided on: 13th September, 2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HPSEB Ltd. & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Hukam Ram ....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent states that in view of the subsequent developments, he wishes to withdraw OA No.2599/2015, out of which the present Writ petition arises. In that view of the matter, no order is necessary in this Writ petition and OA no.2599/2015 is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaenous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice
September 13, 2024( Pardeep)
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) J udge
HPSEB Ltd. & Ors.
Hukam Ram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
