Petitioner's representation had been considered and she was suitably adjusted per instructions on record; petition closed without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Durga Devi vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWP No. 1488 of 2024.
01.04.2024 Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Addl.A.G., for the respondents.
Instructions have been placed on record,
according to which representation of the petitioner has been considered and she has been suitably adjusted.
In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition and the same is accordingly closed.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
1st April, 2024. (Jai)
Durga Devi
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
