Petitioner withdrew a writ petition seeking adjustment at vacant posts, conditioning withdrawal on pending representation and interim continuation.
Permission to withdraw petition with liberty to seek adjustment at vacant station within two days; interim relief to continue till decision on representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:10572
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1449 of 2024 Decided on 04th November, 2024 Sanjeev Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral )
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petition but with liberty to the petitioner to seek his adjustment at some other station, where the post(s) are lying vacant, by way of filing an appropriate representation.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod)
Sanjeev Kumar
State of Himachal Pradesh
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
