Writ petition closed after the State placed on record institutions memo and office orders addressing the grievance; petitioners reserved liberty to pursue surviving grievances through appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neelam Devi and Ors Vs. State of H.P. & Ors
CWP No. 1328 of 2024
10.12.2024 Present: Mr.S.K. Banyal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. L.N.Sharma Additional Advocate General with Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
Learned Additional Advocate General has
placed on record institutions memo dated 09.12.2024 alongwith office orders dated 06.11.2024 and 14.11.2024
Taking note of above, proceedings are closed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of their surviving grievances, if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
December 10, 2024 (R.Atal)
Neelam Devi and Ors
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
