Disposed¶15

Pratibha Kumari v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC22 Oct 2024CWP/10980/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; CWP No. 10980 of 2024; Pratibha Kumari v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others; decided 22.10.2024; Justice Ajay Mohan Goel (oral judgment); neutral citation 2024:HHC:10089; writ petition disposed of with direction to competent Authority to decide petitioner's representation (Annexure P-6) within six weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-6), in light of the averments made therein and the judgments relied upon by the petitioner, within six weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. ¶15

Pratibha Kumari Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2024:HHC:10089

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

CWP No. 10980 of 2024

¶4

Decided on: 22.10.2024

¶5

Pratibha Kumari … Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹ _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)

¶8

Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Law Officer, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶9

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served, in case, the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the petition as Annexure P-6 with regard to her grievance, is directed to be decided by the competent Authority within some reasonable time.

¶10

This writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-6, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein as well

¶11

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

¶13

2024:HHC:10089

¶14

as the judgments being relied upon by the petitioner, within a period

¶15

of six weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶16

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge

¶17

October 22, 2024 ( narender )

¶18

Digitally signed by BHUPENDER KUMAR DN: C=IN, O=HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, OU=HIGH COURT BHUPE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA, Phone=04d8bcd7412dcb18b7b081df02fb3b 89ecc4a0c8f8a66ab97285dc56e62d41fe, PostalCode=171001, S=Himachal Pradesh, SERIALNUMBER=2ccc91b5122501da0ce3 NDER 678b0e2b7bd5fa9b09937769da5501e1f4e7 ad448bc5, CN=BHUPENDER KUMAR Reason: I am approving this document with my legally binding signature Location: KUMAR Date: 2024-10-23 14:45:36

Pratibha Kumari v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratibha Kumari v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devender Singh Vs Union of India and Others

Ramesh Chauhan Vs Hpsebl

Anil Kumar Goma Vs Rakesh Kanwar

Narender Kumar Vs Smt Satya Devi

Vimla Devi Vs State of Hp and Others

Subhash Chand Vs Baryama