Kapil Raj Sharma vs Dharam Pal; Cr.MP(M) No. 734 of 2024; Cr. Revision Filing No. 2473 of 2024; condonation of delay in filing criminal revision; no objection by respondent; Rakesh Kainthla, Judge; decided 2.9.2024; application allowed and disposed of.
Delay in filing the petition condoned; application disposed of. ¶7
The application for condonation of delay is allowed because counsel for the respondent/non-applicant raised no objection, and the delay in filing the petition is condoned. ¶7
Kapil Raj Sharma Vs. Dharam Pal
Cr.MP(M) No. 734 of 2024
2.9.2024 Present:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
M/s Basant Pal Thakur, and Shivam Sharma, Advoates for the respondent.
Cr.MP(M) No. 734 of 2024
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/ respondent submitted that he has no objection in case the present application is allowed. In view of this, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the petition is ordered to be condoned.
Application is disposed of.
Cr. Revision No. _____ of 2024 (Cr. Revision Filing No. 2473 of 2024)
The delay in filing the petition is condoned
vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 734 of 2024. It be registered.
Lit this matter on 9.9.2024 , as prayed for.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
2nd September, 2024 (Chander)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the Criminal Revision petition (Cr. Revision Filing No. 2473 of 2024) should be condoned.¶7
How this case reached the court
Applicant filed the instant application Cr.MP(M) No. 734 of 2024 seeking condonation of delay in filing a Criminal Revision petition (Cr. Revision Filing No. 2473 of 2024).¶9
Counsel for the respondent/non-applicant stated before the Court that he had no objection to the application being allowed.¶7
After condonation, the revision petition was to be registered and the matter listed on 9.9.2024.¶12
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
