Bail-related application before the High Court; counsel for the applicant sought and obtained permission to withdraw the application, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 2885 of 2023 Decided on : 3.1.2024
Sonu Kumar
…Applicant Versus State of H.P. …Respondent
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the Applicant : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr.Tejasvi Sharma, Add. A.G. with Ms. Leena Guleria, Dy. A.G., for the respondent-State.
Virender Singh, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the applicant, under instructions,
submits that he intends to withdraw the present application. Permission
granted.
Consequently, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Virender Singh) Judge
January 3, 2024 Kalpana
Sonu Kumar
State of H.P.
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
