Court denied bail due to pending serious NDPS charges and incomplete prosecution evidence. Withdrawal of petition permitted with liberty to file later. Trial to conclude by July 31, 2024
Bail denied; withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 213 of 2024 Date of Decision: 15.06.2024
| ------------------------------------------------------------------- Paras Versus |
---------------------- ...Petitioner |
|---|---|
| State of Himachal Pradesh ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
…Respondent ---------------------- |
Coram: |
|
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
---------- |
For the Petitioner: Mr. Raman Sharma, A Vinod Thakur, Advocat |
dvocate vice Mr. e. |
| For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. and Mr. B.C.Ver |
Vishal Panwar ma, Additional |
| Advocate Generals, Chauhan, Deputy Advo |
with Mr. Ravi cate General. |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) |
---------------------- |
| Respondent-State has filed status | report and PSI |
Manoj Kumar has come present alongwith the record.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
present petition, with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired.
(Sandeep Sharma)
Judge
June 15, 2024 (shankar)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner accused of serious offenses under sections 20 and 21 of the NDPS Act pending examination of six prosecution witnesses.
Whether to grant permission to withdraw the bail petition with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage.
When the matter should be concluded given the petitioner has been in custody for more than two years.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Paras
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
