Anticipatory bail petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated the petitioner had been acquitted by the trial Court; pending applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 09/2024 Decided on: 05.04.2024
Olga Varshokova ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Bhupinder Ahuja, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated at Bar
that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner has been acquitted by the learned trial Court.
having been rendered infructuous.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Pending application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja ) April 05, 2024 Judge (raman)
Olga Varshokova
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
