Vipul v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
None; the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 1922 of 2024 Decided on : 06.12.2024
Vipul
....Petitioner Versus
State of H.P.
....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting. No.
For the petitioner : Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, State Additional Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Permission granted.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also pending applications, if any.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vipul
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Rakesh Kainthla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRMPM/1922/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court