COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP (M)…
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP (M) No. 650 of 2024 Date of Decision: 17.06.2024
Ram Lal ... petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla , Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondent : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted.
( Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
17th June, 2024 (saurav pathania)
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Ram Lal
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
