The appellant/applicant was granted liberty to withdraw the instant application (Cr.M.P No. 2110 of 2024) and was given liberty to file it afresh. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Gajender @ Pintu vs. State of H.P.
Cr. Appeal No. 171 of 2023
13.06.2024
Present: Dr. Sahil Malhotra, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G with Mr. Navlesh Verma, Addl. A.G and Mr. Raj Negi, Dy. A.G for the respondent.
Cr.M.P No. 2110 of 2024
Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant seeks permission to withdraw the instant application with
liberty to file afresh. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge June 13, 2024 ( Sushil Kukreja ) (naveen) Judge
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
