Vikram Singh and Another v. State of Hp and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 898 of 2024 Date of Decision : 17.09.2024
Vikram Singh & Anr. ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No
| For the petitioner | : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General. |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel
for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted.
as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s),
if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
17th September, 2024 (Nikita)
Vikram Singh
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court