Mukesh Saxena v. Hppcb

Himachal Pradesh HC17 Jul 2024CRMMO/509/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Adjournment/listing order of 20.03.2026: suo motu PIL CWPIL No.11 of 2016 (Court on its own motion v. State of H.P. & Another) with connected CWP Nos.3462 of 2019, 414, 416, 417, 418, 4961 of 2021, 1761, 1771 of 2022 and Cr.MMO Nos.509 and 510 of 2024 listed for 15.05.2026 after counsel for Union of India reported a meeting scheduled on 27.03.2026 to finalise the analysis report along with action plan and propose various measures. Parties on record include State of H.P., State Pollution Control Board, Central Pollution Control Board, M/s Sagar Industries, respondents No.109 and 110 and petitioner(s) represented by R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate. Bench: G.S. Sandhawalia, CJ and Ranjan Sharma, J. No merits decided, no statute or precedent cited. Keywords: pollution control board, analysis report, action plan, PIL, listing.

Mukesh Saxena Vs Hppcb — Himachal Pradesh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court on its own motion v. State of H.P. & Another a/w connected matters

¶2

CWPIL No.11 of 2016 a/w
CWP Nos.3462 of 2019, 414, 416,
417, 418, 4961 of 2021, CWP
Nos.1761, 1771 of 2022 and
Cr.MMOs No.509 and 510 of 2024

¶3

[Item D-6]

¶4

20.03.2026.

¶5

CWPIL No.11 of 2016

¶6

Present : Mr. Abhimanyu Rathor, Advocate, as Amicus Curiae.

¶7

Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent-State.

¶8

Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Senior Advocate with Ms. Godawari, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocates, Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, Ms. Dhanvanti, Advocate, Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate and Ms. Sanjeevni, Advocate, for the respective respondents.

¶9

Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate, for M/s Sagar Industries.

¶10

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Virbahadur, Verma, for State Pollution Control Board.

¶11

Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for Central Pollution Control Board.

¶12

Mr. Jyotirmay Bhatt, Advocate, for respondents No.109 and 110.

¶13

CWP Nos.3462 of 2019, 414, 416, 417, 418, 4961 of 2021, CWP Nos.1761, 1771 of 2022 and Cr.MMO Nos.509 and 510 of 2024.

¶14

Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).

¶15

Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State.

¶16

Mr. Keshav Dutt Shreedhar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shreya Chauhan and Ms. Sneh Bhimta and Mr. Maan Singh, Advocates and Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for State Pollution Control Board.

¶17

Counsel for Union of India submits that meeting is scheduled on 27^th March, 2026, whereby, analysis report has to be finalized along with action plan and to propose various measures.

¶18

Accordingly, list the matter on

¶19

15.05.2026 .

¶20

(G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice

¶21

(Ranjan Sharma) Judge March 20, 2026

¶22

[Shivender/Bhardwaj]

Mukesh Saxena v. Hppcb

Case brief

What is this about?

Mukesh Saxena v. Hppcb

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neel Kanth Dutta Vs Hpsebl

Daulat Ram Vs Hrtc and Others

Karam Chand Vs State of Hp and Others

Imjs Sidhu Vs Hp Pollution Control Board

M/S A2Z Departmental Store Vs the Bhagat Urban Co-Op Bank Ltd.

Babu Ram Vs State of Hp and Others