Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition (Cr.MMO No.422 of 2022) with liberty to file appropriate proceedings at an appropriate stage. The court granted this request.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceeding at appropriate stage was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:6683
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No.422 of 2022 Date of Decision: 09.08.2024
_______________________________________________________ Asad Kabir Quaan
…….Petitioner
Versus
Mohammad Islam & Anr.
… Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 2-State.
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file appropriate proceeding at appropriate stage, if so required and desired. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
August 09, 2024 (sunil)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Asad Kabir Quaan
Mohammad Islam
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
