Petition withdrawn at counsel's request with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in an appropriate court; petition disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 145 of 2024 Date of Decision:04.07.2024
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valister ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For the Petitioner: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1/State. Ms. Diksha Thakur, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, if required and desired.
(Sandeep Sharma)
Judge
July 04, 2024
(shankar)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Valister
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
