State v. Ashok Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Proceedings abated due to the death of accused Ramesh Chand, Jagan Nath, and Sarv Dyal. Hearings adjourned two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings abated qua deceased accused; matter listed for hearing in two weeks.
What the court decided
State of H.P
Vs.
Ramesh Chand and anr. a/w connected matter.
Cr. Appeal No. 221 of 2009 a/w Cr. Appeal No. 291 of 2009
Cr. Appeal No. 221 of 2009
10.07.2024 Present : Mr. Ajeet Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the appellant/State.
Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired.
Cr. Appeal No. 291 of 2009
Mr. Ajeet Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the appellant/State.
Ms. Tejasvi, Advocate, vice Ms. Sheetal Vyas, Advocaet, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2 and 3.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State of H.P
- respondent
Ramesh Chand
- respondent
Jagan Nath
- respondent
Sarv Dyal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR.A/291/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court