Petitioner sought closure of Criminal Petition proceedings in light of the respondent's reply. The court recorded the submission and ordered the proceedings to be closed and notice discharged.
Proceedings closed; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:10793
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
COPC No.341 of 2024 Decided on 07th November, 2024
Hemant Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar
…Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners: Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral )
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the
light of the reply filed by the respondent, the proceedings be closed. Ordered accordingly.
stands discharged.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
November 07, 2024 (Vinod)
Hemant Kumar
Rakesh Kanwar
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
