Contempt proceedings arising from non-compliance of a writ judgment; respondents' counsel stated the judgment stands complied with, acknowledged by petitioner's counsel, and the court closed the contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:9584
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.244 of 2024 in CWP No.3514 of 2023 Decided on: 04.10.2024
Raghubar Dass & others … Petitioners Versus Rohan Chand Thakur & others … Respondents Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the judgment in issue stands complied with. This fact is acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
October 04, 2024
(Rishi)
Digitally signed by AVNISH KANT TIWARI Date: 2024.10.04 17:35:22 UTC
1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Raghubar Dass
others
Rohan Chand Thakur
others
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
