Petitioner alleged non-compliance with a judgment's mandate in contempt proceedings; counsel for the petitioner conceded compliance, and the court closed the proceedings and discharged notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 10 of 2024 Decided on : 8.4.2024
Virender Singh Ashish Kumar
Versus
…Petitioner
…Respondents
___________________________________________ Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
________________________________________________ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Chaudhary,Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Rajan Kahol,Additional Advocate General.
Sandeep Sharma Judge (oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that mandate contained in judgment alleged to have been violated, stands complied with.
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same are closed. Notice discharged.
(Sandeep Sharma ) Judge
April 08, 2024 (veena)
2
3
Virender Singh
Ashish Kumar
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
