The petitioner sought to withdraw the CMPMO before this court. Permission granted to withdraw, and the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition which is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No.523/2024 Decided on: 10.09.2024
Sohan Singh ...…Petitioner Versus Bhadar Singh …… Respondent
……………………………………………………………………………….. Coram Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate. For the respondent : Nemo
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel
for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the instant petition as the petitioner intends to avail appropriate remedy as may be available to him, in accordance with law, for redressal of his grievances. Accordingly the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
September 10, 2024 (Rohit)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Sohan Singh
Bhadar Singh
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
