Arbitrator-referred dispute resulted in petition not pressed, leading to its dismissal and disposal of pending miscellaneous applications without merits.
Petition treated as not pressed; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No.180 of 2024
Decided on: 13th September, 2024
_________________________________________________________________ Amin Chand & Ors ....Petitioners Versus Kewal Kishore Kalra & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
lWhether approved for reporting?
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Y.P.Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of dispute between the parties having been referred to the learned Arbitrator on 24.05.2023, he is under instructions not to press this petition. The petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.
l Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also
stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
September 13, 2024
R.Atal
Amin Chand & Ors
Kewal Kishore Kalra & Anr.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
