The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present CMPMO petition. The Court granted permission, resulting in the dismissal of the instant petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No.118 of 2024
Date of decision: 15.05.2024
Mahant Raj Chadha (deceased) through LRs. ...Petitioners. Versus Suresh Kumar Sharma. ...Respondent. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Tanu, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 15th May, 2024 Judge (Pardeep)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Mahant Raj Chadha (deceased) through LRs.
Suresh Kumar Sharma
Satyen Vaidya
Pardeep
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
