Application seeking condonation of a 92-day delay in filing an appeal was allowed on cogent reasons; appeal directed to be registered and listed after two weeks.
Delay of 92 days in filing the main appeal condoned; appeal ordered to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ravi Dhiman vs. Narinder Kumar
CMP.M-803 of 2024
23.09.2024 Present : Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Suchitra Thakur, Advocate, for respondent/non-applicant.
CMP.M-803 of 2024
Main appeal is barred by 92 days. Hence, this application has been moved seeking condonation of delay. Reply to the application has not been filed by nonapplicant/respondent. I have consider the application and the cogent reasons disclosed therein for condoning the delay. In view of above, the delay occurred in filing the main appeal is condoned.
Application to stand disposed.
FAO No.___________ of 2024
Be registered.
List for consideration after two weeks.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
23th September, 2024
(Pardeep)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 92-day delay in filing the main appeal should be condoned.
Ravi Dhiman
Narinder Kumar
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
