A single judge allowed the application for early hearing and disposed of it. The petitioner relied upon a previous coordinate bench judgment.
Application for early hearing allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of H.P.
CWPOA No. 6199 of 2020
10.7.2024 Present: Mr. Shashi Kant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. A.G., for respondents-State.
CMP-T No. 536 of 2024
Keeping in view the facts and
circumstances of the case, the application for early hearing is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
CWPOA No. 6199 of 2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner
has relied upon the judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 1.7.2020, titled as, ‘Keshav Ram versus State of H.P. & ors’, passed in CWPOA No. 352 of 2019.
Confronted with this, learned
Additional Advocate General sought time to complete his instructions.
List on 25.7.2024.
(Virender Singh) Judge
July 10, 2024 (kalpana)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Keshav Ram versus State of H.P. & orsReferred¶10
Keshav Ram versus State of H.P. & ors
Sanjay Kumar
State of H.P.
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Virender Singh
Parties & counsel
