The High Court of Himachal Pradesh withdrew an original writ petition on the ground that the petitioner had received the desired benefits. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and pending applications disposed of.
Petition withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.5283 of 2021
Decided on: 26th February, 2024
Deepa Kapoor
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
….Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
| For the petitioner: | Mr. Mr. |
Vinay Mehta, Advocate vice L.S. Mehta, Advocate. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondents: | Mr. Gen |
Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate eral. |
Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral)
Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate, on instructions of
original counsel, Mr. L.S. Mehta, prays for withdrawal of
the present writ petition, as the desired benefits have been given to the petitioner. The prayer being innocuous, is not opposed by the learned State Counsel also and is
granted in the interests of justice.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is permitted to be
withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma) Judge
February 26, 2024
(Bhardwaj)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition ought to be dismissed in the circumstances of the case.
Deepa Kapoor
State of Himachal Pradesh
Ranjan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
