Hitanshu Jishtu and Another v. Sanjay Ronta
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Arb.Case…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Arb.Case No.526 of 2024
Decided on: 01st October, 2024. _________________________________________________________________ Hitanshu Jishtu and Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Snajay Ronta …Respondent ________________________________________________________________ Coram_ Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Mamta Bhatwan, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the learned Arbitrator has already entered upon the reference. The petitioners intend to move appropriate application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. In view of aforesaid submission, present petition is disposed of with the directions that interim orders dated
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
- 2 -
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- ARB.C/526/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court