The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed an execution petition upon the petitioner's counsel stating that the impugned judgment had already been complied with by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 83 of 2022. Date of decision : 13.7.2023.
Chandu Ram ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with and Mr. Ramakant Sharma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.Gs and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that since the judgment in question has been complied with by the respondents, therefore, the present petition may be closed. In view of this, the present petition is closed.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge.
(Satyen Vaidya) 13th July, 2023 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Chandu Ram
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
