The execution petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls during pre and post lunch sessions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Execution Petition No.118 of 2020 Date of decision: 04.04.2023
Pardeep Singh ….Petitioner Versus The State of H.P. & Ors. ….Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1
For the Petitioner: None. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral):
Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls during pre and post lunch sessions, the present execution petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
April 04, 2023 (reena)
1
Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement ?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether execution petition is maintainable given lack of appearance by the petitioner?
Pardeep Singh
The State of H.P.
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
