The court, on November 4, 2023, in CWPOA No.5992 of 2020, heard the petitioner's counsel for clarification. The court noted that a separate judgment of the same date had already allowed and disposed of the petition. No substantive reasoning or outcome is provided in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Prakash Chand & others vs. HRTC
CWPOA No.5992 of 2020
04.11.2023 Present:
Mr.Shyama Prasad Chatterji, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Nitin Rishi, Advocate, vice Mr.Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the respondents.
Reheard for clarification of certain points.
Vide separate judgment of even date, placed on the file, the petition is allowed and disposed of.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge
November 4, 2023 (Purohit)
Prakash Chand & others
HRTC
Vivek Singh Thakur
Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
