The High Court of Himachal Pradesh held that a claim for pension is premature while the petitioners are still in service. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as premature along with pending miscellaneous applications.
Writ petition disposed of as premature. Pending miscellaneous applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 5766/2020 Decided on: 10.10.2023
Faqir Chand & Ors. .…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao,Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta and Ms. Priya Sharma, Advocates.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao (Chief Justice) (Oral)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
pension is premature, since the petitioners are in services of the
respondents as on date. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
premature. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao ) Chief Justice
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge
10th October, 2023 (rohit)
Faqir Chand & Ors.
State of H.P. & Ors.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
