Petitioner filed a writ petition claiming it had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The court disposed of the petition accordingly. No substantive legal proposition or issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWPOA No. 5180 of 2020
Date of Decision: August 22, 2023
Bimla Devi …Petitioner.
Versus
State of HP & others
.....Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Ms. Heena Advocate vice Mr.B.S. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr.Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General.
Vivek Singh Thakur, J (oral)
Learned counsel appearing for petitioner, under instructions of learned original counsel Mr. B.S. Thakur, Advocate, submits that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
Therefore, the petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. August 22, 2023 (Bipin Chander Negi) (ms) Judge
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Bimla Devi
State of HP
Vivek Singh Thakur
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
